From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Mar  6 11:50:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA07240
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 11:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07196
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 11:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.5/8.8.2) id UAA09729; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 20:49:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Message-Id: <199703061949.UAA09729@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD lpd Security Vulnerability (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9703061914.AA21857@clunix.msu.edu> from Joe Budzyn at "Mar 6, 97 02:14:03 pm"
To: budzyn@clunix.cl.msu.edu (Joe Budzyn)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 20:49:03 +0100 (MET)
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Joe Budzyn wrote:
> 
> When this patch is applied, nslookup breaks.  It needs to be recompiled to 
> work.  Is there anything else that might break?

Excuse me??? Why do you think nslokup would break? I don;t recall
nslookup calling rcmd?

-Guido