Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:56:39 -0400 From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> To: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X Message-ID: <CAJxePNJbGtbqFkRMuhyMv-2Zs=PGi-Jxx2dpa_xj-S9eFP=Y7g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAJxePN%2BntvVpmFaA51c15cJe=oqBFAMLg=xWyCpFS3smL_g93A@mail.gmail.com> <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hey, nothing wrong with jumping up and down :)) I'm not looking for a custom package. What I am looking (and a lot of other users out there) is: mod_php & php-fpm as a separate mainstream package without using /usr/ports mod_php is a must, right now the only way to reach that functionality is to use /usr/ports (or build it from source) php-fpm is just another way to accomplish php functionality in apache some users would prefer php-fpm over mod_php, some would prefer the other way but at this very moment neither of those solution is available through package only through /usr/porsts since this module is its own separate package admin who doesn't require this functionality obviously doesn't have to install this package. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> wrote: > alexus wrote: >> slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely >> used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through >> mailing lists and other ways > > Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you > want custom packages set up your own tinderbox or package builder machine. > > -- > Alex Dupre -- http://alexus.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJxePNJbGtbqFkRMuhyMv-2Zs=PGi-Jxx2dpa_xj-S9eFP=Y7g>