From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 9 3:31:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hungry.spb.cityline.ru (hungry.spb.cityline.ru [212.46.192.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DAE37B5E6 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 03:31:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@hostonfly.com) Received: from 192.168.1.126 (ip-1254.dialup.cl.spb.ru [212.46.200.32]) by hungry.spb.cityline.ru (8.8.8/8.8/CL) with ESMTP id OAA02908; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 14:26:22 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 14:24:22 +0400 From: Dmitry Koltsov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.38e) S/N A1D26E39 / Educational Reply-To: Dmitry Koltsov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2600.000709@hostonfly.com> To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[3]: load balancing In-reply-To: <55240464990.20000709122200@buz.ch> References: <55240464990.20000709122200@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org it is critical only for server down, balancing work fine ;-) Best regards, Dmitry Koltsov Host On Fly S.A. mailto:root@hostonfly.com GA> Hello Dmitry, GA> Saturday, July 08, 2000, 6:34:24 PM, you wrote: >> We use DNS with TTL=1 sec on our system for load balancing. >> If one of servers goes down, traffic is arranged on the rests >> approximately for 20 s. GA> I thought about doing this. What are the implications about those GA> people who use non-standard DNS caching techniques in order to cut GA> down their DNS load? GA> Best regards, GA> Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message