From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:29:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D24106566B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofd-freebsd-virtualization@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E1B8FC1B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0os-0003Ev-Ci for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:34 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:34 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:20 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120110 Thunderbird/9.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: FreeBSD guest on VMware ESXi X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:29:38 -0000 On 19/12/2011 18:34, Lucas Mocellin wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I may have mistaken sending my question here, if so, please let me know. > > I would like to get more information about FreeBSD as a guest on VMware > ESXi. I'm having some issues about performance (specially Harddisk I/O). Firstly, how did you conclude the disk performance is bad? How did you measure it? To what did you compare it? Virtualization always introduces IO latency. Secondly, ML 350 is a product family - which generation (e.g. G6?) do you have? This is important because only G6 supports Nehalem-type CPUs which have EPT support - everything older is simply too slow.