From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 21 19:14:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA01544 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:14:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01524 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:14:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA05639; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:14:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:14:08 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Victor Manuel Carranza Gonzalez cc: FreeBSD Questions mailing list Subject: Re: ld.so and 3.0-SNAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Victor Manuel Carranza Gonzalez wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Doug White wrote: > > > You need to reinstall the related package/port. Which library was > > reported missing? > > One of them was libtermcap.so.2.1 > In fact, I found that the missing libraries were the ones with names > ending with .2.1, and there were similar ones in the system, but named > xxxx.so.3.0, so I made a soft link with the xxx.so.2.1 name and it worked > fine, but I'm sure this is not the real solution... > > By the way, the Pine package was installed from the same 3.0-SNAP CD. > > Is it advisable to use the soft-link method with all future "missing > library" errors? It did never happen before with my 2.1.x and 2.2.5 > boxes. Did you upgrade the userland with your SNAP CD? YOu can't just update the kernel and call it done; you need the new improved libraries too. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major