Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:49:10 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: <matthew@phoronix.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Michael, Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk>, Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <20120104184910.0d604240@kan.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20120104223158.911B11065678@hub.freebsd.org> References: <CACqU3MXz-vCt8Agkq=z7zyr7ptMgthRBsETxyaFQahX9X1uzPg@mail.gmail.com> <20120104223158.911B11065678@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800 <matthew@phoronix.com> wrote: > Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking > on [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the > developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor > scores on be 'it should be tuned, is configured for a diffe The > response from us to this comes in two forms. &nb 1) If it is the > wrong workload for the platform, do a public pos explaining and > analysing the results. Highlighting the rationale fo r the > concious reduction in performance (ie: journaling filesystems with > ba filesystem integrity 2) If tuning can have a material impact > on the results, post a t uning guide with step by step and > rationale. Ie: educate the communit Michael and I have had many > discussions with vendors an on this. In almost all cases, the > vendor has either cha default configuration or accepted the results > as valid. As guide, Micha comparison. To dat offer. In part, > thi public, but that is more of a result of a one sided d party > external to a particular community (with a healthy tou > journalisticly pumped compare & contrast). For the FreeBSD > community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually runs > public c Matthew Not really related to the discussion on hand, but the above about the most unreadable email I am yet to read on the public mailing list. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFPBOV6Q6z1jMm+XZYRAn7AAKDDqfIxM5+mvV3YaP5WyZ7e0ed09QCgzKBU P1N6ba6nwNiQNjP2lDWmJQI= =05rk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120104184910.0d604240>