Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:41:56 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Juli Mallett <jmallett@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r242142 - in stable/9: sys/dev/filemon tools/regression/filemon Message-ID: <20121026164156.GR35915@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20121026164003.GG43045@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201210261607.q9QG7raE035736@svn.freebsd.org> <CACVs6=-VHrUNbeSUuT3=8pWHDy-buBH5mTngcgPM-riKTKK%2BMA@mail.gmail.com> <20121026164003.GG43045@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Y2Rj1EjdQE2iTVT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:40:03AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:20:39AM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: > > Under half an hour of MFC time seems rather too quick. If this was > > being insta-MFC'd because of some kind of security concern, then it > > would be nice to have seen it signed off by SO, and treated like a > > security issue. >=20 > It paniced several boxes at work, and I'm asking RE@ if its possible to > get into 9.1-R for some new deployments we'd like to do (and trying to > track stock FreeBSD for). Getting into stable/9 is a 1st requirement. >=20 > [ I expect a "NO" from RE@, but I want to try and thus need to submit the > request with 'svn merged' patch. ] This cannot be a valid reason for insta-MFC. Juli is absolutely right. --4Y2Rj1EjdQE2iTVT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCKvVQACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4i97wCfd+YX6FeQTt4VdFb8Q5NIBUZP ELcAn1VEbnY0rqOC3U/6C1vqj4nm5NNS =u8Pd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Y2Rj1EjdQE2iTVT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121026164156.GR35915>