From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 22:59:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793134AEBDC for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cnp7P4wFhz3vYj; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0B4Mxh4v009620 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0B4Mxhmh009619; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:43 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Jan Beich Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored? Message-ID: <20201204225943.GA9439@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20201204203507.GA8573@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Cnp7P4wFhz3vYj X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[128.95.76.21:from]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[128.95.76.21:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.669]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:59:46 -0000 On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:41:41PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Steve Kargl writes: > > > It takes a long time to compile on my laptop. I have > > > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 > > Why do you need to redefine current default? Simply changed /etc/make.conf on my laptop from 80 to 90 when I got a similar problem trying to rebuild gnuplot. Getting llvm10 when LLVM_DEFAULT=80 or 90 seems dubious. > Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: > LLVM_DEFAULT?= 90 > > > % portmaster -Byd gnuplot > > ... > > Install devel/llvm10 > > ... > > Install devel/llvm90 > > devel/llvm10 is pinned by graphics/mesa-* likely to reduce QA after a > fiasco in bug 239682. Trying to unpin in bug 250869 was rejected. > > graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common: > LLVM_DEFAULT= 10 Well, I guess that pretty much kills LLVM_DEFAULT for any modern hardware (even a 8 year old laptop) that uses drm unless a user wants base-system llvm, llvm90, and llvm10 installed. One will certainly be able to compile any c/c++ thrown ones way. -- Steve