From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 2 08:00:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81D81065672 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beyert@cs.ucr.edu) Received: from sentoku.ucr.edu (sentoku.ucr.edu [138.23.214.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF6D8FC1D for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beyert@cs.ucr.edu) Received: from aeonserv.aeonnet (cpe-76-90-217-240.socal.res.rr.com [76.90.217.240]) by sentoku.ucr.edu (MOS 3.10.3-GA) with ESMTP id ECE41545 (AUTH tbeye001); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:49:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:49:55 -0800 Message-ID: <87ocwkfjoc.wl%beyert@cs.ucr.edu> From: Timothy Beyer To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200903020330.n223U1bb066640@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 21) (Educational Television) (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Junkmail-Status: score=0/50, host= Cc: Timothy Beyer Subject: Re: ports/132241: add LATEST_LINK to ports: lang/tcl84, lang/tcl85, lang/tcl86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:00:38 -0000 Hi, I just noticed that there already is a LATEST_LINK variable in every port that I patched, but it does not work for the port options file. It seems that when my patches are applied, the ports I that I noted then get correct port options file paths, and as a bonus, the tcl8*-thread port option files start working correctly as well. I don't really know why the old LATEST_LINK variables didn't work, maybe because they are bound after the port options file is determined. (?) So my patches are still relevant, though the maintainer might want it written differently. Tim