From owner-freebsd-security Sat Dec 4 5:16:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE9714D3F for ; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 05:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA16283; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 08:16:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from ospf-mdt.sentex.net (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA23675; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 08:15:55 -0500 (EST) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: danh@wzrd.com (Dan Harnett) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Other outstanding vulnerabilities Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 13:15:54 GMT Message-ID: <384913e7.733706143@mail.sentex.net> References: <3.0.5.32.19991202154308.01bc93c0@staff.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 3 Dec 1999 10:34:35 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you wrote: >Hello, > >It has been my experience that the setsockopt() DoS can be avoided by setting >NMBCLUSTERS to a reasonably high level and setting a limit on the number of Hi, Whats a reasonably high number ? Thanks, ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message