From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 3 20:29:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA23458 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 20:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA23447 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 20:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA12079; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 20:27:10 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607040327.UAA12079@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: New (BIOS) bootblock ?feature? To: julian@ref.tfs.com (JULIAN Elischer) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 20:27:10 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607032339.QAA03550@ref.tfs.com> from "JULIAN Elischer" at Jul 3, 96 04:39:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > How does this interact with erich@uruk.org's "multiboot" proposed > > > > standard and code? > > > > > > can you give me a pointer? > > > > http://www.uruk.org/grub/boot-proposal.html > > > > He recently released code in several news groups... he's the Intel > > employee working with the SMP project. > > I looked at his stuff. > I don't think it's really relevant to these changes.... Well, that's why I asked. 8-). I say integrate the changes, they are a win. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.