Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:27:06 -0700 (PDT) From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Ports with version numbers going backwards: x11/electricsheep Message-ID: <20050518142707.15405.qmail@web31006.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What is the best way to fix this? How about bumping PORTREVISION? --- chkversion <kris@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > From chkversion Wed May 18 01:33:27 2005 > Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:33:27 -0400 (EDT) > From: chkversion <kris@FreeBSD.org> > To: FreeBSD ports <kris@FreeBSD.org> > CC: bms@FreeBSD.org, dyeske@yahoo.com > Subject: Ports with version numbers going backwards: x11/electricsheep > > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one > ** > > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that > version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. > Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for > more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade > and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. > > Please fix any errors as soon as possible. > > - *x11/electricsheep* <dyeske@yahoo.com>: electricsheep-2.6 < > electricsheep-2.6b7 > | revision 1.19 > | date: 2005/05/17 16:44:55; author: bms; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 > | Update to 2.6 point release. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050518142707.15405.qmail>