Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:57:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227450] [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? Message-ID: <bug-227450-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227450 Bug ID: 227450 Summary: [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: henning.matyschok@outlook.com Created attachment 192442 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D192442&action= =3Dedit Patch for if_gif(4). First, I want to apologize for my bad English, because I'm not a native speaker. Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? This question opened to me as I tried to understand the internal structure = of gif_transmit in the context of encapsulating Ethernet frames as service data units of EtherIP prtocol.=20 If I understood correctly, then gif_transmit would be called by bridge_enqu= eue at runtime, if an instance of if_gif(4) is member interface of if_bridge(4)? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227450-227>