From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Jun 4 2:27: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEDB37B401 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:27:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f549O9F25747; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: "Georg-W. Koltermann" Cc: Erick Kinnee , Subject: Re: Xircom RealPort Cardbus Ethernet 10/100+Modem 56 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: > Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > Yup. I have a RBEM56G-100 that works great (except crashing the machine if > > I take it out) under -current. The ethernet works out of the box with the > > if_dc driver and the modem works with a patch to the sio driver. Search > > the -mobile list for Xircom and sio. There's a patch that Warner and > > another person discuss. > > That's interesting (the if_dc working). I had problems with a CISCO, > while I could network with a UNIX box just fine. Windows 2000 has no > problems with the card, even with a CISCO. See my attached posting. > Maybe the difference is that I have a CBEM56G while you possibly have > a RBEM56G? duplex mismatch? Cisco's are notorious for totally botching autonegotiation. Other than that, I was under the impression that the CBEM was the same as the RBEM just in a different packaging. Could be wrong though. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message