From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 17:15:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5530616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338B843D1F for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (78383f4146e0ae76fad54b1f58741aef@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i470FPfj014690; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 30E1A521DA; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:25 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Richard Coleman Message-ID: <20040507001524.GA4315@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040506110926.GA57750@xor.obsecurity.org> <409A3B95.A004E0CF@cetp.ipsl.fr> <002601c43374$776a61e0$23916401@mypc> <409AD33A.9030002@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <409AD33A.9030002@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: x11@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FYI X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 00:15:28 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:07:22PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote: > I'm not sure why the XFree folks felt the need to change the license.=20 > But on the other hand, I'm not sure why the GNU/Linux/OpenBSD folks=20 > think it's such a big deal. My understanding is that the new XFree=20 > license is similar to the old, original BSD license (correct me if I'm=20 > wrong). >=20 > But the new Xorg stuff looks pretty interesting, so it will most likely= =20 > be a non-issue in the end. It's all politics. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAmtUcWry0BWjoQKURAtfHAJ43RDBuIof+KWsP2Gdbo5JsBFabdACfdu/D Y7PX8Bhm4FmH+dI8BbW/bFA= =QmEN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--