From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 01:19:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC781065675 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5016F8FC08 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E04FB5619E; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:59:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:59:18 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: siur Message-ID: <20111213005918.GA7432@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:19:13 -0000 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:46:08PM +0400, siur wrote: > why there is still no packages for 10-current? Did I miss something? We're trying to debug multiple package building problems, and currently using i386-10 for that. Until we get farther along with that process, we aren't doing amd64-10 yet. mcl