From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Jun 14 4:58: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3B137B409; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:57:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA27400; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:57:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Archie Cobbs Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need Linux emulation patch review References: <200106132353.f5DNrro64784@bubba.packetdesign.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Jun 2001 13:57:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Archie Cobbs writes: > > Would someone who "knows" Linux emulation be willing to review > > the patches in: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=26546 > > Yup. It has quite a few style(9) issues (though they can easily be > resolved), and I think the mapping can be greatly simplified by using > ifp->if_index as the eth unit number. Linprocfs already uses this > scheme for proc/net/dev, and it would be embarassing to have two > different and conflicting mappings. > > BTW, does Linux use the "ethX" designation also for non-Ethernet > interfaces (e.g. Token Ring)? [let's move this thread from -developers to -emulation] DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message