From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jan  7 18:01:14 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id SAA02977 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 18:01:14 -0800
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA02971 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 18:01:04 -0800
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA18256; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 18:00:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA00675; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 18:00:47 -0800
Message-Id: <199501080200.SAA00675@corbin.Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: rjb@intac.com
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can't get FreeBSD 2.0 to see my ethernet card. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Jan 95 20:54:57 EST."
             <199501080154.UAA01365@nile.intac.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 1995 18:00:46 -0800
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>that's supported and present. During the initial boot phase I see 'ed0 not
>found at 0x280' and 'ed1 not found at 0x300'. I've check my kernel
>configuration file and the pseudo-device ether is definitely set along with
>'ed0' and 'ed1'. Coming from a System V background, this handling of the

   What I/O address is your card set to?

-DG