From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct  8 06:53:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA27440
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 06:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.225.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA27432
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 06:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12)
	with ESMTP id OAA17429 for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:51:43 +0100
Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA17428 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:57:40 +0100
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:57:40 +0100
From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <199610081357.OAA17428@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: apache under FreeBSD better than under Linux?
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Could someone give me some arguments, what I could tell a person
who is having problems with httpd under Linux, why FreeBSD and the apache
httpd is a better choice?

One argument could be tha SYN flood countermeasures in the present SNAP.
Other comments?

--Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de