Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 17:02:28 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: Paulo Menezes <paulo@thor.dee.uc.pt> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, paulo@isr.uc.pt Subject: Re: Upgrade of Mesa Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.970129170129.3950B-100000@gilligan.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970129193038.412A-100000@thor.dee.uc.pt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Paulo Menezes wrote: > > Hi, > > I am once again porting the new version of Mesa to FreeBSD. > Now I have a question, in the previous version I have used for version > numbers of the shared libraries the pre-previous + 1 rule. > But I think it makes little sense in using something in FreeBSD like > ...so.14.0 where the other systems use .so.2.1 for the same version. > What do you recomend, using the release number for these or ignore it and > add a symlink like "ln -s ***.so.2.1 ***.so.14.0"? Could you include some more information as to how the Mesa authors are identifying this release? ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95q.970129170129.3950B-100000>