From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 17:10:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C37937B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modusponens.dnsalias.org (pool-151-203-188-249.wma.east.verizon.net [151.203.188.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994DF43E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jay@eziba.com) Received: from eziba.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by modusponens.dnsalias.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g690CGju000306; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:12:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jay@eziba.com) Message-ID: <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:16 -0400 From: Jay Sachs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton Cc: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > > >>I thought I would repost this with more information. >> >>I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my >>4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get >>to before. > > > This is because the default in ssh seems to have changed from "Protocol > 1,2" to "Protocol 2,1". The following in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or > ~/.ssh/config should do the trick for you: > > Host * > Protocol 1,2 > > DES, > > Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA > thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this > topic. There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, and a move forward. It seems excessive to wait for the switch to 5.0-RELEASE for this change, and somewhere between any two 4.X releases seems just about right. IMO, if (at the *bare minumum*) you don't read and understand UPDATING after cvsupping, don't track -STABLE. (It's always struck me as a bit oxymoronic to apply POLA criteria to -STABLE). jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message