From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Nov 10 11:58:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA29742
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA29735
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15759(6)>; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:58:06 PST
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177557>; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:57:53 -0800
To: Denis DeLaRoca 825-4580 (310) <CSP1DWD@mvs.oac.ucla.edu>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bpf-1.1, libpcap-0.2.1 and tcpdump-3.2.1 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 10 Nov 96 01:51:00 PST."
             <199611100951.BAA26958@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:57:47 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Nov10.115753pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199611100951.BAA26958@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
>Will these new versions make into the 2.2 release?

libpcap-0.2.1 and tcpdump-3.2.1 are in contrib.

There are several diff's between bpf-1.1 and the bpf that's in the FreeBSD
tree.  Some of them seem to be the same thing done in different ways,
some of them might be different functionality.  Is there anything specific
that bpf-1.1 does that FreeBSD's doesn't that you need?

  Bill