From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Jan 21  7: 1:46 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB601540A
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:01:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from will@blackdawn.com)
Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6614A19B9; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500
From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
To: Per Kristian Hove <perhov+abuse@math.ntnu.no>
Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness??
Message-ID: <20000118193532.J457@argon.blackdawn.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0001180856020.18019-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>; from perhov+abuse@math.ntnu.no on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Per Kristian Hove wrote:
> Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so
> I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to
> show that it's always been this way.

DOS epoch == UNIX epoch. At least, in my tests of my code that uses
time_t, they both start on January 1, 1970 at 00:00 UTC.

I used CodeWarrior Pro 2 + GCC 2.95.2. YMMV.

(Not like this really matters anyhow.. ;-)

--Will


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message