From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 17 09:14:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FEE16A415; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout1.pacific.net.au (mailout1-3.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8743D45; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAB15A073F; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:14:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420E827405; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:14:19 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:14:18 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral In-Reply-To: <20061116164053.GR57732@registro.br> Message-ID: <20061117201026.N11101@delplex.bde.org> References: <20061030192702.GG76994@registro.br> <20061111091844.I63959@fledge.watson.org> <20061116164053.GR57732@registro.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: kreios@gmail.com, freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:14:22 -0000 On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > I made some tests using 7.x with all the debugging disabled: > > queries / s > > Int bind (d_t) bind (e_t) nsd (1_s) nsd (2_s) > --- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- > > bge 15439 14733 12910 10946 > em 37655 34092 42411 41974 > /// > The results are very good for em NIC, better than my numbers [1] with > FreeBSD 6.1 some months ago. So I guess that we had an improvement :-) > > But I got the same poor performance with the bge interface. The > problem remains. > > [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011767.html Try my fix for bge's interrupt handling in freebsd-net. Bruce