From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May  1 14:28:41 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB16114CC8
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  1 May 1999 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from feral.com (mjacob@feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA17134;
	Sat, 1 May 1999 14:28:06 -0700
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 14:28:06 -0700 (PWT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: softupdates still alpha?
In-Reply-To: <199905012125.OAA79115@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905011427490.17071-100000@feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 
>     I think the only known bugs right now occur sometimes when the filesystem 
>     runs out of space.  I would say that softupdates is essentially
>     production quality.  I've been using it on all my systems for months 
>     with no problems beyond a few esoteric issues.  A couple of problems
>     showed up when I began softupdates on swap-backed VN volumes.  Those have
>     now been solved.

What about the 'do not use with DEVFS' ?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message