From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Tue Apr 3 04:32:23 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EC6F80D3E for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 04:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E24F85368 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 04:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 15-v6so10737785itl.1 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 21:32:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vnboHRjrRjY6pMWRzK7U5yUo/4nwagM8YPKD1rmARFA=; b=S6Y9tig/c+x9I3QGsh9/0VKpH0U49y0i8AKD4jUH0Mkcfp2AkHLfNERNxsq/PKf4m1 +H4XbtC2t0WStwh+KuTHvZd85c5pvJqZzs3ExcaEEAraPCgBsPFe4wOUt7IN60ufQQFM 7z6c+zDdeHDp5ma7cnH6BLsTjj4FDkFYOGZ3zN85c6P6GCBG0WkmnF9fcVORJR97ybdC qbhV3Ey0Pkiw+jb/qnB6pV5/Fq4634qIhal3YCA08Vl4dvBrFBduemWGUOhE4YWqbGyj hnG/52OIBDI1k0sKUeWUwdVVWiMQvdehjSWKV9TBQ427o2dasTd8n4eWJhVsM24249tk st5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vnboHRjrRjY6pMWRzK7U5yUo/4nwagM8YPKD1rmARFA=; b=EPVVA69L3zdp5S5cIzNor1WLTcxmlD4wZoru9eg2KVheyzLw8CyCkcxLgrqWdFTK4M OFC6WsG2Q+aOJZs98wTyPR8fmTcQFLipjWWcmctp09YOcDCOuTskGZb0PaIelr51B8Lv 2oRPHGgk5ldA7rDzAAC5CyNIoP3Zn0nfgi8xX6sL9xaPi3D++4HjME8Owd08MbVhTYWX pZyS9sNZY2UrvnMG2YdIZ7p34yWwgVmz3sjgd+3B3SQLlgs5Fb30q/5ILZ+sYbE49UkW AOgibAlZX9yNtewQDxUN4WmAf5AwuS6num/5xS+dZYcaQLGqwAVA7OAkdsbKqm1zqSR2 wNWg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDqi5TpbRU4gUjSkgrTJBuFCeUo4yEkGHxm3zWWWb8qVChJOcK1 0VkvWRxz/tEILyuK6D7/SZ/WCllP6x7WMZeKyG32zQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+/7b+YQuwvkgmemJbIOYA0e/xwdCn1Qd1z0FCvLPDa8NDppr2ysZKnioR1sNvd4mdZ1ObjN5s2jcshkfKgtXk= X-Received: by 2002:a24:fa83:: with SMTP id v125-v6mr3581803ith.36.1522729942522; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 21:32:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201804030202.w3322xXG085227@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <1522729305.49673.206.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1522729305.49673.206.camel@freebsd.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 04:32:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... To: Ian Lepore Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Mark Linimon , Ed Maste , Dimitry Andric , Antoine Brodin , svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , re , svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:45:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 04:32:23 -0000 On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 10:22 PM Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 19:02 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > > So, the takeaway is, this change stays, and stable/11 users that build > > > their own ports are on their own? > > > > > > Whatever happened to POLA? > > I have no idea, but I fully agree that changing compilers 30 days before > > a code slush is just a very bad move. > > > > The llvm in 11.1 is 4. > > Is there some pressing reason that we need llvm 6 to be in release 11.2? > > > > Looks like I wont be upgrading to 11.2 as I am sure I'll have blocking > > issues with some ports. > > > > Though I could probably build them with 11.1, I hate that idea as then > > I have to keep an 11.1 around incase I need to rebuild something. > > > > :-( > > I was hoping to import 11.2 to our repo at $work and be shipping > products based on it later this year. But there's no way we have > resources available to sidetrack and start debugging out of the blue > failures of ports that have been working fine for us until now. I guess > the best I can do now is import 11-stable immediately before the > compiler change. At least I was lucky enough to get all the arm changes > important for us MFC'd before the compiler change. > All depends on which ports are broken... would be nice to have a list... Warner >