Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:37:31 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syslog.conf syntax change (multiple program/host specifications) Message-ID: <200302131637.h1DGbV92036827@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200302130459.38238.wes@softweyr.com> References: <20030210114930.GB90800@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <200302121615.h1CGFdGG025691@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <p05200f10ba70be419852@[128.113.24.47]> <200302130459.38238.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 04:59:38 +0000, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> said: > My point exactly. Garrett's point about all those programs having > differing syntax in their configuration files completely ignores > the fact that all those programs do different things; the differing > syntax is a feature of the differences of the program. No, the differing syntax is a consequence of the fact that the programs were all written by different people, none of whom could be bothered to create an extensible format and an appropriate set of reusable library routines to parse it. These differences in syntax are completely artificial, and unnecessary. (I think there's even a whole chapter about this in /The UNIX-Hater's Handbook/; the people who wrote that book were mostly coming from the Lisp Machine community where this is not true.) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302131637.h1DGbV92036827>