From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May 19 01:08:53 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA04261
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 23:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA04208
          for <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 18 May 1998 23:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01824;
	Tue, 19 May 1998 16:53:47 +1000
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 16:53:47 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199805190653.QAA01824@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG, grog@lemis.com
Subject: Re: /sys/device.h: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Anybody seen the message
>
>  /sys/device.h: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
>
>in recent builds?  It comes from a comment:
>
>      DV_TTY                  /* serial line interface (???) */
>
>The ??? have the form of a trigraph, but for some reason the compiler
>complains about them though they're in a comment.  I suppose it's a
>compiler bug, but the comment itself doesn't make any sense.  Who's
>for fixing the comment?

It should never be seen because <sys/device.h> should never be used
(it goes with BSD4.4's "new" config, which we don't use).  The warning
is only given if the nonstandard option -Wall is in CFLAGS.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message