From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 1 14:29:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607771529F for ; Sat, 1 May 1999 14:29:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA79750; Sat, 1 May 1999 14:29:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 14:29:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199905012129.OAA79750@apollo.backplane.com> To: Matthew Jacob Cc: Kris Kennaway , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates still alpha? References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> I think the only known bugs right now occur sometimes when the filesystem :> runs out of space. I would say that softupdates is essentially :> production quality. I've been using it on all my systems for months :> with no problems beyond a few esoteric issues. A couple of problems :> showed up when I began softupdates on swap-backed VN volumes. Those have :> now been solved. : :What about the 'do not use with DEVFS' ? Better to say "Do not use DEVFS". DevFS's problems have little to do with softupdates. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message