From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 22:53:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902A106564A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793348FC15 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB655C28 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:07:23 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C93A5C22 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:07:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F5E7D44.9000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:48:36 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F5E031D.5060203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:53:52 -0000 On 03/13/12 06:07, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrkowrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> I have one machine behaving unstable. This happened before 9.0. After >> upgrading to 9.0 machine was given a light load and now it reboots. Memory >> was already tested (without any errors) and changed after another reboot. >> > So your RAM is good enough to pass a memory test. It doesn't mean it's not > the culprit. Way too many false negatives from those things. > Overnight soak test with memtest possible?