From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Jul 12 7: 5: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from q.closedsrc.org (ip233.gte15.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.244.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A9F37B403 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lplist@closedsrc.org) Received: by q.closedsrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 02C0B55407; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by q.closedsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53A351610; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:48:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Linh Pham To: Romulus Cc: Subject: Re: Please have some phucking RESPECT for the BSDs!!! In-Reply-To: <002201c10adb$308172b0$c450149a@romulus> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think companies will listen to the community better if the message is in a professional and much more mature manner than what was written. Plus _spamming_ the sales department of all of those companies won't help, and many will just look at the subject line, frown and probably delete it. I don't want to speak for the community, but I think the community want to be portrayed as a whiny, immature crowd. >>> The reason why I included freebsd-doc was that from the mail headers, it showed freebsd-doc as the owner of the message-id. My guess is that freebsd-doc could have been bcc'd. -- Linh Pham [lplist@closedsrc.org] // 404b - Brain not found To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message