Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:16:34 -0500 (EST) From: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net> Cc: Renato Botelho <garga@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform Message-ID: <3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> In-Reply-To: <837B0CE2-F5DE-4D75-9FAE-044574D00E30@tandon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wietse: > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > Clamav uses loopback on its testing phase, and works fine on the build > cluster. Sahil Tandon: > What irks me is that all other Postfix versions (that also call > postconf) have no problem building/installing on the cluster. It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made available including line of source code, and any system configuration details that are necessary to reproduce the condition. If this turns out to be highly-classified information, then we can communicate off-list. My PGP key is linked off http://www.porcupine.org/wietse/. Wietse
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT>