Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:43:23 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r315536 - in head/games/blobby: . files Message-ID: <20130329114323.GA47948@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130329112201.M58847@FreeBSD.org> References: <201303291022.r2TAMhKY044686@svn.freebsd.org> <20130329104052.GA33138@FreeBSD.org> <20130329112201.M58847@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:33:15AM +0000, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:40:52 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote > > > -PORTVERSION= 1.0r1 > > > +PORTVERSION= 1.0r3 > > > > It would be nice to use DISTVERSION one day (when would be > > possible without reordering pacakge version). > > [...] > > Thanks for the hint! Unfortunately, as you say, with the following patch > [...] PORTVERSION would become 1.0.r3, which is < 1.0r3, so I would need > to bump PORTEPOCH to switch to this new naming scheme. Not sure it is > better than using the current DISTNAME+WRKSRC combo :/ If course bumping PORTEPOCH is not better. Hence, we need to wait for 1.1x or something to make the switch. Right not it's OK leave it as it is. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130329114323.GA47948>