Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:59:53 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: timur@freebsd.org Subject: Samba34 install characteristics. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002081153140.16894@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Why if samba, samba33, samba34 can not be installed together does samba34
decide to use var/db/samba34 var/log/samba34 & local/etc/samba34 when
samba33 just used samba without the version suffix ?
Curious question because now if I want to continue with the scripts that
use those directories without the version suffix I either have the choice
to edit the scripts or to symlink samba -> samba{suffix}. The later is
probably going to be the case. ;(
Is there a chance to change that around yet ?
Thanks.
- --
jhell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLcEMQAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+ZwQIAJPQzyB1uPWwI4NvfwJwdXX9
6hjDqcNIXt+IWDQeCu7o+ztvOZhXIGaXq1H7r9DLUj3+C4u5JKxdUF/oYoMuIjhY
AmTW1tNgxmhn8lXksfBbKyEU9UIZ9fz37KDSlWw4gwG6kXJtD8eVzoJeC2qTtQX/
Glztz20ppC8FDtTmF0isy9fYs3GZICQEpiiIsqEpn7pKfGOjJWsQTbTh4ZpqiAZD
84hFy4hvnC1QD6waIWrUyp8JBqiYgvnzrBcaN5EmcMgQKa+Gywq1H54Ht1mrAZtS
v8YDIRsiQnzgqv4WMEUAKvD1eSDr4rPkEdBrz2qqlkmNRjCZlZ5vmm07YhNX0RM=
=cWOj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1002081153140.16894>