From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 22:13:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852D51065695 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1D28FC1D for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 160B9191A4C; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:13:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8OMAd2l021573; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.6/Submit) id m8OMAcSZ021572; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200809242210.m8OMAcSZ021572@saturn.kn-bremen.de> To: datahead4@gmail.com X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.emulation In-Reply-To: References: <20080921204025.GA81055@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Organization: home Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: qemu svn r5281 on FreeBSD - slow usb, vmwarevga, screen updates... (now updated to r5313) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:13:17 -0000 In article you write: >On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Juergen Lock wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've been playing with qemu svn on FreeBSD again (new experimental >> emulators/qemu-devel port update here: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080921.patch >> ), and want to note a few things: > >Hi. I've built an updated port with your patch and it compiles fine >and runs my WinXP guests well. But, the qemu process consumes 100% of >one CPU core on the host the whole time it is running, regardless of >what the guest is doing. The host is a 7-STABLE box from 8/19. The >guests run with bridged networking and full kernel kqemu accel >enabled. > Hmm. And you didn't see this with the version in ports? Have you checked if this is related to kqemu? (try without -kernel-kqemu and also with -no-kqemu.) Also, which threading libs and scheduler are you using? There seems to be an issue with kse, tho I doubt you are using that on 7-stable... Here is another experimental update that forces -lthr on 6.x, and also updates to qemu svn r5313: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080924.patch >Thank you for the continued work on this port! You're welcome! :) Juergen