From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jun 9 18:08:47 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA15065 for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jun 1995 18:08:47 -0700 Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [144.206.136.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA15049 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 1995 18:08:43 -0700 Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA12520 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Sat, 10 Jun 1995 05:06:13 +0400 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Sat, 10 Jun 95 05:06:13 +0400 Received: (from ache@localhost) by astral.msk.su (8.6.8/8.6.6) id FAA00754; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 05:03:43 +0400 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: boing@adnetsol.com, bugs@FreeBSD.org, mal@algonet.se, rls@hades.id.net References: <199506092328.QAA06737@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199506092328.QAA06737@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>; from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Fri, 9 Jun 1995 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Organization: Olahm Ha-Yetzirah Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1995 05:03:42 +0400 (MSD) X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.37 FreeBSD] From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA?= =?KOI8-R?Q?=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" X-Class: Fast Subject: Re: make doesn't like lines with a tab only Lines: 60 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2138 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In message <199506092328.QAA06737@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Rodney W. Grimes writes: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> >> In message Geff Hanoian writes: >> >> >At 9:22 PM 6/10/95, =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA?= >> >>error. As I notice, this nitpicking change (producing error) >> >>cause too many ports Makefiles to be converted. >> >> >> >>I vote for removing this superflows checking. >> >> >All I see here is a bunch of whining. A simple sed will turn a makefile >> >with the: >> > statement >> > >> >> Count number of diffs you need to produce for "ports" collection >> f.e. It becomes really bothering. >> >> >"error" into a working makefile. So why move away from a BSD standard? >> >> It isn't BSD standard, it is later NetBSD addition AFAIK. >> BSD 4.4 and earlier don't have it, POSIX GNU make don't have it too. >NetBSD implemented this and had the same argument we are having on >there lists 4 or 5 months ago. The outcome of that arguments was the >code we lifted from them. Now, we did this change 3 months ago, >you should have complained then, not now when in the middle of cutting >the final release. I don't understand, how general discussion in mailing list can affect cutting the final release. >If GNU make don't have it, it is *NOT* POSIX conformant! Just read POSIX spec. P1003.2, "make" command f.e. It says nothing about error condition there. Moreover NetBSD (and FreeBSD now) makes only blames on it, other world makes don't. - -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBL9jva+JgpPLZnQjrAQFG/gP9H533k9Ye5L7AuuNFSNzpu0WvUbK3MtJV P4PC9j6c92YKZuvpkDtMLNA3TQTJggRDiZFV/nhfKCPRpNKGV5X/bvUYWIzyKeKw AsFAo1U089mLqG/uJLit0jxzNSXbR4qowPg8mbC0KpKxhuo1phIwy1HWbxRlbO6X Zp+xuErrrd4= =jxvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----