From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 26 15:50:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F72106568B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97988FC17 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9QFo2sQ091738 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9QFo2qU091737; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:02 GMT Message-Id: <200910261550.n9QFo2qU091737@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ruby@FreeBSD.org From: Stanislav Sedov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/100776: ports-mgmt/portupgrade: Failure to update devel/mico by portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stanislav Sedov List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/100776; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stanislav Sedov To: Kostik Belousov Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/100776: ports-mgmt/portupgrade: Failure to update devel/mico by portupgrade Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:48:03 +0300 --Signature=_Mon__26_Oct_2009_18_48_03_+0300_oc6dRvTdhxOEPg.c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I think that this issue should be fixed in devel/mico as there's not much can be done by portupgrade itself. Furthermore, erroneous dependencies on include files already installed instead of the bundled ones can lead to build/runtime failures in case of ineterfaces changes. I belive it should be quite easy to fix by patching mico to provide paths to local bundled includes to GCC before system include paths. --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE --Signature=_Mon__26_Oct_2009_18_48_03_+0300_oc6dRvTdhxOEPg.c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJK5cS3AAoJEKN82nOYvCd0kFsP/0XSCji06U+6JGVXjjdraQPy O6J1YlXOzBME2PtMhHTJufFQ5qUajdzudLySRfGVQKvKYfJE/QIUuqb65cWRihVH OA4x4cL1iuiYd4+yRDmC3EaKTBVw4YdxHypWsRNnGF8lflQPQfMV+AUddeB+KsWi LME2J4hcXAvnNsANfKBEEmlc1zEYf68B5ltasKp80UDPRdei21Nax0S0M9qudhLZ 204P5c5vS/sXSwvG9ZzkP4frB56mxITI/qOij6bGi1S+s6lVXvuPxP52rxbQ5VVT mF7bCEjNAlVIX0K4Y1DDBar4Ro0c9F9iBoUZ73f9GGKVvSuMbsDtCBCpGrW/kyG6 OWRnNjOCv38S9A9FpDy6hc9ucdE8n9TFXgLrIDIsWJSgZqTmGRT42wWBT08yvTdC pCFL+7vj5BwexprsyIhUwTULSRuICz6xSFrYQVMW5EHAyfGHb/gNN7OL5d/DGkNM dnNax+k4rJaYDeJCD78PIQM2nnuJRFP9rtNhQ+3jUswoCq0EHCNM7S3YEBnDYJ9S 2U/dq1uKnZWUfXasoCzdiYmu/7jUhrDyVbfCzsK7/0y3/qAf1LcY07YBYPVE71mI 1MWDPNt9dzZ3Fso7PmFMQZ7kYyJt98qAiC4D3uG3c7j7BqRmwuRgOxhpio2jiV7o 7+nmtAG+YkAoDj/F6gQp =duzP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__26_Oct_2009_18_48_03_+0300_oc6dRvTdhxOEPg.c--