From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 11 16:53:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F3C14D23 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:53:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA02724; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:52:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca44-42.ix.netcom.com(209.111.212.170) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma002638; Wed Aug 11 18:52:22 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id QAA91808; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT) To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: glib-1.1.x and LATEST link References: <19990811164915.A78506@nuxi.com> From: Satoshi Asami Date: 11 Aug 1999 16:52:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:49:15 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "David O'Brien" * Shouldn't glib11 have a NO_LATEST directive? * cdrom:.../ports/i386/packages-3-stable/Latest/glib.tgz points to * ../All/glib-1.1.16.tgz and I thought we wanted glib-1.1.x to die. You're right. And glib11-devel too. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message