From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 16:37:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE921065694 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6AA08FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2011 16:37:12 -0000 Received: from adsl-39.79.107.47.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.192]) [79.107.47.39] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu004) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2011 17:37:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX181OAgd9y412Ok7tCNB6FFm7j7b7PIguvkr5kR7ul EBRgenYIavBkVu Message-ID: <4D5FF174.3080501@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:36:04 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kevin References: <000c01cbcf94$35e76e20$a1b64a60$@com> <4D5FAC16.7080207@gmx.com> <00a201cbd03f$2bdc3540$83949fc0$@com> <4D5FD91F.20704@gmx.com> <00a801cbd04f$b3991920$1acb4b60$@com> In-Reply-To: <00a801cbd04f$b3991920$1acb4b60$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridging + VLANS + RSTP / MSTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:37:14 -0000 On 2/19/2011 6:11 PM, kevin wrote: > One other thing : > >> id 00:17:d6:a9:31:e7 priority 16384 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 > > And : > >> root id 00:12:cf:69:e9:ea priority 16384 ifcost 0 port 0 > > > I was under the impression the priority for the root bridge should be a > lower number ? The priority is checked first when two bridges exchange BPDUs. The bridge with the lower number wins. If the priority is the same then the bridge's ID is used for the elections. It would be best to manually set the priority in order to know who is administratively the active firewall. > Would you be able to post your rc.conf bridge entries for > each bridge, perhaps? Sorry, this is a lab environment, I am not using rc facilities. It is just a shell script... Nikos