From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 2 12:19:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA16553 for current-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [195.1.171.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA16502 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:18:42 -0700 (PDT) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 9310 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Oct 1997 19:18:32 +0000 (GMT) To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which PCI Ethernet card is best for FreeBSD-current? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Oct 1997 21:03:19 +0200" References: <5117.875818999@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 21:18:32 +0200 Message-ID: <9308.875819912@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have a machine with 4 of the ZNYX boards (16 ports total) doing the > "collapsed backbone" thing. Works like a charm, and in difference > from a cisco that would cost 10 times as much, you can run tcpdump > and trafshow on it :-) Good point. However, I suspect you may not be able to route 16 ports at full Ethernet speeds. Have you tried saturating multiple segments with ttcp? Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no