From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun May 26 09:57:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA04185
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA04176
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 May 1996 09:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0uNj7p-0003w5C; Sun, 26 May 96 09:57 PDT
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA03371; Sun, 26 May 1996 16:57:04 GMT
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers)
Subject: Re: unix + asm 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 May 1996 11:45:00 +0200."
             <199605260945.LAA01614@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 16:57:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3369.833129823@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> As Chris J. Layne wrote:
> 
> > > Of course, all this raises the question: why do you wanna do this?
> 
> > Uhh, so I can try ASM on my unix machine, is their something wrong with 
> > that? =)
> 
> The only thing that's wrong is that you'll only need it in < 1 % of
> all your time (except you're going to debug and optimize locore.s --
> but you might be too late, Poul-Henning already did this recently :).

Au contraire my dear Watson, it can easily bee seen that it runs slower
now.  Since it only runs once however...

The point is that now you can (hopefully) read it.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.