From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 20 08:18:12 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA27452 for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:18:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA27427 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA02822; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:16:38 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Bruce Evans , current@freebsd.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf.c and USL copyright at top In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 1995 06:42:21 PST." <1140.819470541@time.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:16:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2820.819476198@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > OK, so it was a mistake to add code to encumbered files. No argument > from anybody on that point, I'm pretty sure. However, do we just > throw up our hands in defeat? I surely hope not! Your analysis below > would certainly suggest to me that removing the USL copyright is now > an option we can realistically entertain. It's not even remotely > "derived" from now. In our CVS tree, we're no worse off than before. > In our exported tree, it's one less encumbered file, right? right. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.