From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Feb 10 13:13:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.ca (epsilon.lucida.ca [209.47.215.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD68637B491 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 5815 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Feb 2001 21:12:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Feb 2001 21:12:54 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:12:53 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Heckaman To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD-ADVOCACY Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:INSERT_NUMBER_ HERE In-Reply-To: <20010210130001.A65847@mollari.cthul.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: ... : Amusingly, FreeBSD *is* auditing parts of the ports collection. We've : discovered and published quite a few vulnerabilities already. This is the whole point! The REASON we've been seeing tons of port advisories is because they are being audited. The security team should be thanked for that. Otherwise these bugs would probably be unknown! * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.ca http://www.lucida.ca/pgp * * GPG fingerprint - 53CA 8320 C8F6 32ED 9DDF 036E 3171 C093 4AD3 1364 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.ca/pgp iD8DBQE6ha7WMXHAk0rTE2QRAhgYAJ9u3ACDsVW6/rgh1DnqmjyutrS5owCgvPWP 3jHwdbyhq+TcBbSs3cSov04= =sMKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message