From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:19:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF162106570D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 18:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F578FC17 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 18:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m5p.com (wonderland.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::19]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p08IJmeJ011576 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 13:19:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george@m5p.com) Received: (from george@localhost) by m5p.com (8.14.4/8.13.7/Submit) id p08IJmhe001670; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 13:19:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 13:19:48 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <201101081819.p08IJmhe001670@m5p.com> From: george+freebsd@m5p.com To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-to: <4D28A838.7080906@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.5 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:19:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: NFS Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:19:54 -0000 > FYI, -stable is probably the better list for this. > > On 01/08/2011 09:54, george+freebsd@m5p.com wrote: > >> George > >> I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, > >> a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have > >> you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount > >> options ? > >> > > > > I'll update to 8.2-RC1 later today and see if anything changes, but I > > started seeing the problem as early as 8.0-RELEASE. -- George > > I think it's great that you're reporting the problems now, but your > statement above makes me wonder if you reported them then? > > > Doug No, I did not report the problems then. -- George