From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  6 04:57:10 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1363F1065672
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jan 2011 04:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9508FC0A
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jan 2011 04:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2])
	by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p064uweM099440
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:57:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Message-ID: <4D254B99.1010501@feral.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:56:57 -0800
From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
Organization: Feral Software
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031017110.1450@desktop>	<20110103220153.69cf59e0@kan.dnsalias.net>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031859290.1450@desktop>	<20110104082252.45bb5e7f@kan.dnsalias.net>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1101041030120.1450@desktop>	<20110105124045.6a0ddd1a@kan.dnsalias.net>	<20110105175926.GA2101@vniz.net>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1101051413070.1450@desktop>	<D3E4F3D4-55FD-48B5-B175-CF152B9B3AE4@samsco.org>	<20110106024403.GB22349@vniz.net>	<8A69DE05-A433-4D40-8E63-8F06215606F2@samsco.org>
	<4D254909.5040604@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D254909.5040604@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6
	(ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]);
	Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Linux kernel compatability
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:57:10 -0000


>
> Vendor vs User, two sides. Here, if one is native, another
> is emulation, people would run native version rather than emulation.
>
>

Hmm. Large chunks of code is run in the windows world in 'emulation' 
mode. I don't think people really care as long as it doesn't mess up and 
annoy them.