From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 30 23:25:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from isua5.iastate.edu (isua5.iastate.edu [129.186.1.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2288D37B85D for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:25:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ccsanady@iastate.edu) Received: from localhost (ccsanady@localhost) by isua5.iastate.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA30984 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200007010625.BAA30984@isua5.iastate.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Bridging problems.. (WaveLan related?) Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 01:25:37 CDT From: Chris Csanady Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have been trying for over a week now to get bridging working, but without success. I have tried both 4.0 and current, but with no luck. Anyways, my setup is as follows.. On one end is a Lucent WavePoint attached to the outside world. (Some sort of switch I believe. I really don't understand the setup--they are using some sort of vlan stuff) I'm tempted to replace the WavePoint with a PC, but I don't have the hardware for that now. On my end, I have a box with a wi0 and fxp0--I was hoping to set it up to do transparent bridging. So far however, I can't get anything on this side of the bridge box to talk to the outside world. I can see all the network traffic from my box, however I can't talk through the bridge. Basically, any arp request that goes out, seems to disappear. If I run tcpdump on the wavelan interface, it shows the arp requests, but never any replies. I can see incoming arp requests for my box, and it seems to send the reply, only to be lost somewhere as well. Another interesting thing occurs from the bridge box itself. If I ping the network broadcast, only things on the wavelan side reply. This may be some irrelevant quirk, I'm not sure. Has anyone ever set up a box like this? Will it work with a WavePoint attached to a switch on the other side? I can't see why it shouldn't, but maybe I am missing something. Does the wavelan network need to be "ad-hoc" instead of BSS mode? All I know is this is becoming really irritating. (Not FreeBSD, but the fact that we don't have direct access to the network on the other side.) We have been trying to get this set up since May, and it has been a nightmare to deal with the politics and to debug it from one side. Ugh. Any theories/etc would be very welcome.. Thanks, Chris Csanady To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message