From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 24 10:32: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CC315015 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:32:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ccstore@qcislands.net) Received: from [209.53.238.8] (helo=wwwa.qcislands.net) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 3.036 #1) id 12CoHK-0006Tf-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:31:54 -0800 Received: from ccstore by wwwa.qcislands.net with local (Exim 3.01 #3) id 12CoHK-0004C0-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:31:54 +0000 From: Jim Pazarena To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: inetd with wrappers built-in X-Mailer: SCO Shell Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:02:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <10001241002.aa25082@ccstores.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can anyone confirm yay/nay if the wrappers which is built-in to the inetd on 3.4 has the blacklist patch compiled into it? -- Jim Pazarena mailto:paz@ccstores.com http://www.qcislands.net/paz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message