From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 13 09:52:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA26306 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntserv.webleicester.co.uk (ntserv.webleicester.co.uk [206.249.75.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA26300 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phil.webleicester.co.uk by ntserv.webleicester.co.uk (NTMail 3.02.07) with ESMTP id va025059 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:52:36 +0100 Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Phil E Taylor" Organization: Lan Systems To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:42:12 +0000 Subject: Re: BSD/OS webperf notes, anybody want to test FreeBSD? Reply-to: phil@lansystems.co.uk Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.42) Message-Id: <16523614000363@webleicester.co.uk> X-Info: The Web Factory (Leicester) Electronic Mail System Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 12 Aug 96 at 11:33, Jaye Mathisen wrote: Isn't it amazing how whoever performs/sanctions any benchmarks always comes out on top ?????? Also looking at the microsoft document referred to by the document below, http://www.microsoft.com/infoserv/haynes1.htm I saw an interesting thing in the footnote. I didn't realise that Intel now owns Novell :-) > > > http://www.BSDI.COM:81/products/internet-server/benchmarks/webperf.h > tml > > > > I would think we could do better. > Phil Taylor Business : phil@lansystems.co.uk Personal : phil@taylor.org.uk LAN Systems - LAN/WAN Specialists Tel: (Direct Line) +44 (116) 223 0033 (Main Number) +44 (116) 255 9961 (Facsimile) +44 (116) 255 8861 150 London Road, Leicester, ENGLAND. LE2 1ND