From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 29 18:23:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143F37B502 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91D7B1900; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 20:24:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 20:24:02 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Blackman Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SecureBSD+Jail Message-ID: <20000929202402.O75085@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews References: <118117558520.20000930051732@bignet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <118117558520.20000930051732@bignet.ru>; from blackman@bignet.ru on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 05:17:32AM +0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 05:17:32AM +0400, Blackman wrote: > I have some questions: > Is it possible to use securebsd+jail on freebsd 4.0? > Someone can tell about experience of use this? > What about safety? > > Securebsd project develops or not?:-) SecureBSD has good intentions, but they seem misguided. If they truly cared about improving security of BSD, they would either work with Robert Watson on his TrustedBSD project, or start up an open source project and coordinate with security officers. Anything besides that is a waste of everyone's time. -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message