From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 29 11:47:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307B37C1CF for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:45:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rminnich@lanl.gov) Received: from mini.acl.lanl.gov (root@mini.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.34]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA2708081 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:45:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (rminnich@localhost) by mini.acl.lanl.gov (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03674 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:45:53 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mini.acl.lanl.gov: rminnich owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:45:53 -0700 (MST) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" X-Sender: rminnich@mini.acl.lanl.gov To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How good a job of PCI config will freebsd do? In-Reply-To: <200003291905.LAA01047@mass.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > Well, they're going to have the same basic stuff, and I can see that > they're not having much fun trying to get there. actually, "they" is "me": that's my project. > I'm curious as to what you mean by "have to kill the BIOS" though; I'm > not seeing why it's an issue. Unless you've had to work with 1024 BIOS upgrades, it's not easy to see the need :-) Nevertheless, I'll drop it here. I was curious what FreeBSD could do. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message